Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Success! Now Check Your Email

To complete Subscribe, click the confirmation link in your inbox. If it doesn’t arrive within 3 minutes, check your spam folder.

Ok, Thanks

The Bar Topnotcher Went to a State University. Partners Call It a 'Fit Problem.'

Manila law firms sort associates by which Catholic high school they attended. A provincial grad with a higher bar score gets filed under something vaguer.

Maria Garcia profile image
by Maria Garcia
Wooden letter tiles spelling 'LAWYER' on a desk, with blurred office setting in the background.
Photo: RDNE Stock project / Pexels

Walk into the recruitment lunch at a big Makati firm and someone will ask where you went to school. Not law school. High school. The answer decides which conversations you get let into, which partner takes your calls, which cases carry your name.

A grad from a provincial state university can clear the bar in the top tier and still land in the reject pile marked not a culture fit. Nobody writes that phrase into a memo. It gets said over coffee, and it sticks.

The high school question

The old Manila firms grew out of the same handful of exclusive Catholic schools. Partners hire the way they were hired, and the network feeds itself. A candidate who shares the school gets vouched for by an uncle, a batchmate, a former dean. A candidate who scored higher but grew up in Iloilo or Cagayan de Oro has no one in the room to vouch.

Bar performance is public and ranked. The Supreme Court posts the list every year. State university law programs put people near the top of it regularly. That should settle the argument about who can do the work. It doesn't, because the work was never the thing being tested at the door.

What 'fit' actually screens for

'Culture fit' checks whether you can order at the right restaurant, drop the right last names, and switch to accented English without a Visayan or Ilocano trace. It reads the wristwatch. It clocks whether you say 'restroom' or 'comfort room.' The exam that gets you the license and the interview that gets you the job are grading two different people.

Firms defend the informal screen as client management. Corporate clients, the reasoning goes, want associates who move through a boardroom without friction. The unspoken part is that the client class and the partner class attended the same schools, and friction means anyone who didn't.

The cost lands on the graduate who borrowed for law review fees, sat the bar review on a scholarship stipend, and passed. The reward for that is a starting salary at a firm nobody at the top will introduce to a rainmaking client. The corner office runs on connections that were locked in before anyone opened a codal.

The ledger nobody publishes

Litigation and corporate practice both run on referrals. A junior associate builds a book by being handed one. The associate who came through the school network gets handed early. The topnotcher from the province gets the research memos nobody's name goes on, then gets asked in the third year why the billings are thin.

Law is supposed to be the profession where the merit test is written down and scored by the state. It is. The score gets filed. Then a partner picks up the phone, and the name he already knows is the one that moves up.

Maria Garcia profile image
by Maria Garcia

Subscribe to New Posts

Fresh Philippine stories straight to your inbox, free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Success! Now Check Your Email

To complete Subscribe, click the confirmation link in your inbox. If it doesn’t arrive within 3 minutes, check your spam folder.

Ok, Thanks

Read More